Thursday, February 21, 2013

Judith Herb College of Education, Health Science and Human ...

The International Peace Bureau, Oslo, Norway, has nominated Betty A. Reardon for the Nobel Peace Prize 2013.? Dr. Reardon is an internationally renowned peace scholar and peace educator.? She has been instrumental in the establishment of peace education institutions and programs around the world.? Dr. Reardon has produced an extensive body of scholarship and curriculum that define the fields of peace studies and peace education.

The nomination is posted at: ??IPB Nobel Nominations

The nomination letter includes reference to her collected papers?The Betty A. Reardon Collection?housed at the University of Toledo (Ohio) in the Ward M. Canaday Center Special Collections of the Library. This collection is a project of the University?s Center for Nonviolence and Democratic Education.

http://www.utoledo.edu/library/canaday/guidepages/education.html

http://www.utoledo.edu/eduhshs/centers/nonviolence/index.html

Tags: Canady Center, faculty, Nobel Prize, peace education, Reardon

Source: http://wordpress.utoledo.edu/eduhshs/2013/02/20/betty-a-reardon-nominated-for-the-noble-peace-prize/

the legend of korra three stooges the three stooges the bee gees woodward keratosis pilaris rock and roll hall of fame 2012

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Chuck Hagel Confirmation Idiocy Is No 'House Of Cards'

As I am perpetually two years behind whatever is cool and zeitgeisty on the teevee, I've not been watching this new Netflix joint, "House Of Cards." Which is probably to my detriment. Our own Howard Fineman has been watching the show, and he describes an artful and innovative depiction of "the competition for power for its own sake." And just this weekend, I was at a party where an old friend of mine spoke thrillingly of byzantine plots and cagey backstabbing -- Washington as the setting for the polite bloodlust of brilliant political chess masters.

Which must be why so many people in Washington are into this show: For the escapist fantasy!

In reality, we have the House of Senate, and there's no way of describing those people's machinations without briefly wondering if the word "moron" is strong enough. They are on recess now, having ended their current session by simultaneously refusing to appoint former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) to the position of secretary of defense and making it clear that Hagel is definitely going to be appointed to the post. The senators who oppose him, Republicans all, simply want to leave town and have themselves a good, long tantrum for 10 days or so, because that?s what actually passes for political genius these days.

Meanwhile, the Democratic senators, who support Hagel in lockstep, have to be feeling a little rooked right now. Back when Obama first put Hagel's name forward as Leon Panetta's replacement, it was greeted with a "Feh, okay, that wouldn't be so bad we guess," but I don't think Democrats envisioned that they'd actually have to spend multiple weeks straight up going to the mattresses for the guy. Hagel, himself, seems barely interested in waking up in the morning and facing the day, let alone playing along with this nomination process, so where the Democrats who've had to carry his banner are getting their esprit de corps from is anybody's guess.

Frankly, I couldn't even tell you what it is about Hagel that made him an attractive candidate to Obama in the first place. What makes him sort of interesting is that he wised up early on and recognized the Iraq war, which he voted for, as a money-sucking quagmire, earning the enmity of his GOP colleagues and making him an outcast figure in the Beltway media. There is a part of me that thinks, "Well, it sure would be fitting for someone who was right about Iraq to finally be rewarded." But there's another part of me that realizes that being right about Iraq is a really low bar to clear, not much higher than basic human cognition.

But Hagel's outspokenness about his dislike for that military misadventure has made Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) the most spirited (or at least the most televised) of the Hagel haters. McCain, in classic fashion, has flipped and flopped all over the place in answering how he'll finally decide to vote on Hagel's nomination. He ended last week on the "no vote" side of the fence, telling Neil Cavuto that he's mad that Hagel once "attacked President Bush mercilessly and said he was the worst president since Herbert Hoover and said the surge was the worst blunder since the Vietnam War." Since then, McCain has said that Hagel, while not "qualified," should not be "held up" any further, and he reckons that the confirmation will, in the end, happen. McCain has also said that he won't vote for Hagel, but he still considers him to be a "friend."

And no, I don't think any of that is actually meant to make sense. Proudly not making sense is sort of the point, here.

Remember, the Senate Republicans? very next trick after filibustering Hagel was to insist that they did not, in fact, filibuster him. Sure, they used the filibuster process and exploited the filibuster rules, but they were actually doing something completely different. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) attempted what passes for an "explanation" in this town when he suggested that it was vitally important for everyone to get more information about Hagel and more time to consider his nomination, but that those urgent matters could wait until the Senate got finished with one of its regularly scheduled vacations.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), meanwhile, insisted that it's very important for reporters to use a word other than "filibuster" in their headlines. To which I say fine, let the headline read, "Senate Takes Week-Long Sniveling Snit-Fit."

And remember, there's no twist ending here. Most of the same people who seem to just want to do another week of handwringing just admit that Hagel is going to end up getting confirmed. There is, I suppose, the strain of opposition working the full-on paranoiac beat against Hagel, like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and his dark mutterings of sinister foreign conspiracies, fueled by weaker and weaker sauce. But, as the joke goes: "Say what you want about McCarthyism, at least it's an ethos."

So, enjoy your "House Of Cards." Thrill to the idea of a Beltway set capable of intricate designs and complicated plots. Try not to worry about the fact that in the real world, the same people are constantly losing rounds of rock-paper-scissors to themselves.

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not?]

Also on HuffPost:

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/18/chuck-hagel-filibuster_n_2712874.html

buffett rule lollapalooza lineup joss whedon ronnie montrose melissa gilbert dancing with the stars dandelion wine cough

Saturday, February 16, 2013

In GOP's Hagel Stance, Risks and Rewards

When Sen. Orrin Hatch voted Thursday on the nomination of Chuck Hagel to be defense secretary, his decision showed a surprising note of ambivalence lurking beneath the confrontational stance that Senate Republicans have taken to President Barack Obama's cabinet nominees.

Republicans stalled the Hagel nomination Thursday, using procedural move that has rarely been applied to cabinet choices. Democrats called it a historic act of obstruction.

Mr. Hatch, a Republican from Utah, said neither "yea" nor "nay" on the procedural motion, instead voting "present." Had he voted "yes," Mr. Hatch would have been the deciding vote to end debate on the ...

Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324432004578306502408823868.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy

Natina Reed Sandy Hurricane flight tracker Marina Krim

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Remains of the Day: LastPass Gets an Update, Automates Security Checks

Remains of the Day: LastPass Gets an Update, Automates Security ChecksLastPass gets updated, Adobe addresses a recent exploit, Spotify comes to Windows 8 Phone users, and SkyDrive gets an improved collaboration feature.

  • LastPass 2.0.20 Released for All Browsers, Featuring an Automated Security Score Today LastPass, our favorite password manager, released an update for it's browser add-on. The update includes automated security checks, improved access to the password generator, automatic clearing of all data filled in on logout, and speedier login. [LastPass]
  • Adobe Issues Emergency Flash Update for Attacks on Windows, Mac Users
    Adobe released a patch for Flash yesterday to address vulnerabilities being exploited to target Windows and OS X users. The exploit has only targeted Safari on OS X and Firefox on Windows, and tricks users to open fraudulent Word documents that contain malicious Flash content. [Ars Technica]
  • Spotify Arrives on Windows Phone 8 Music streaming app Spotify was released in beta for Windows Phone 8 today. Much like it's iOS or Android counterparts, the app lets you stream or sync music for free for the first 30 days, after which you'll have to pay $9.99/month to continue using the service on your phone. [Windows Phone Blog]
  • A Billion Office Documents on SkyDrive, Now With Easier Collaboration An update to SkyDrive no longer requires you to sign in with your Microsoft ID when a collaborator shares an Office Web App document with you. Now you can just click the link and start working. [Windows Blog]
  • Elevate Your Apps in Google Drive A small change to Google Drive's Create menu now lists third party apps on the same level as Google apps, making it easier to find new Drive-connected apps to use. [Google Developers Blog]

Photo by photastic (Shutterstock), a2bb5s (Shutterstock), and Feng Yu (Shutterstock).

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/nhuNHEAVpf4/remains-of-the-day-lastpass-gets-an-update-automates-security-checks

kourtney kardashian pregnant kourtney kardashian pregnant billy cundiff

Friday, February 8, 2013

Scientists find key to growth of 'bad' bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease

Friday, February 8, 2013

Scientists have long puzzled over why "bad" bacteria such as E. coli can thrive in the guts of those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), causing serious diarrhea. Now UC Davis researchers have discovered the answer?one that may be the first step toward finding new and better treatments for IBD.

The researchers discovered a biological mechanism by which harmful bacteria grow, edge out beneficial bacteria and damage the gut in IBD. This new understanding, published in the Feb. 8 issue of Science, may help researchers develop new treatments for IBD with fewer side effects than current therapies.

IBD begins when "good" bacteria are mistakenly killed by the immune system, while harmful bacteria multiply ? resulting in inflammation and damage to the intestines, and chronic episodes of abdominal pain, cramping, diarrhea and other changes in bowel habits. It's estimated that IBD, which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, affects 1.4 million people in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In test-tube and animal studies, the researchers found that potentially harmful bacteria in the intestine called Enterobacteriaceae use nitrate ? a byproduct formed during the intestinal inflammation in IBD ? to grow and thrive. Enterobacteriaceae strains include certain E. coli bacteria, which can worsen the intestinal damage of IBD. Eventually, the intestines of those with IBD become overrun by harmful bacteria, and the numbers of normal good bacteria in the gut decrease.

"Much like humans use oxygen, E. coli can use nitrate as a replacement for oxygen to respire, produce energy and grow," said lead author Andreas Baumler, a professor of medical microbiology and immunology at UC Davis.

"In IBD, nitrate produced by inflammation in the gut allows E. coli to take a deep 'breath,' and beat out our beneficial microbes in the competition for nutrients," he said.

The inflammation in the intestines of those with IBD leads to the release of nitric oxide radicals that are powerful in attacking bacteria, Baumler explained. Yet these nitric oxide radicals are also very unstable, and eventually decompose into nitrate, which can be used by bacteria like E. coli to thrive and grow. By contrast, good bacteria in the gut grows through fermentation ? a much slower process.

Determining the reasons why bacteria like E. coli can edge out good bacteria in the gut is crucial for determining new ways to halt the IBD disease process, according to Baumler. Current treatments for IBD suppress the immune response through antibiotics, corticosteroids or other powerful immune-modifying drugs. But long-term side effects can limit their use and their effectiveness for IBD patients.

The UC Davis team's research indicates that targeting the molecular pathways that generate nitric oxide and nitrate, as well as other molecules that feed harmful gut bacteria, could calm down and normalize the intestinal environment in IBD, Baumler noted. They are already doing research with one candidate drug that could halt the multiple pathways by which harmful bacteria thrive in IBD.

"The idea would be to inhibit all pathways that produce molecules that can be used by bacteria such as E. coli for respiration and growth," Baumler said. "Essentially you could then smother the bacteria."

###

University of California - Davis Health System: http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu

Thanks to University of California - Davis Health System for this article.

This press release was posted to serve as a topic for discussion. Please comment below. We try our best to only post press releases that are associated with peer reviewed scientific literature. Critical discussions of the research are appreciated. If you need help finding a link to the original article, please contact us on twitter or via e-mail.

This press release has been viewed 26 time(s).

Source: http://www.labspaces.net/126709/Scientists_find_key_to_growth_of__bad__bacteria_in_inflammatory_bowel_disease

william shatner seattle weather skier sarah burke gingrich wife cheryl burke sarah burke mega upload

Monday, February 4, 2013

Conservatives make gun issue new rallying cry

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) ? An immigration debate is raging and a budget crisis looms in Congress, but the conservative activists gathered outside the New Hampshire Statehouse had just one thing on their minds: guns.

"The Second Amendment is there to protect us from losing the rest of them," said Adam Brisebois, 34, of Hudson, who cradled his 3-year-old daughter on his right shoulder and a rifle on the left. "If we don't fight, we'll lose our rights."

Thursday's rally, organized by tea party leaders, drew nearly 500 people, many of them waving signs and carrying loaded weapons, to the state capital. Conservative leaders elsewhere report a wave of similar protests as grass-roots activists from Florida to Colorado seize on a new rallying cry for a tea party movement, which is trying to recover from a painful 2012 election season.

Many activists aren't happy with the GOP's sudden embrace of more lenient immigration proposals and they're monitoring the approaching congressional deadline to avoid massive cuts to military programs. But for now at least, the debate over guns and the perceived threat of losing them tops their list.

It's an "organic" movement with little coordination from national conservative organizations, according to Amy Kremer, chairman of the Tea Party Express. "It's happening by itself," she said.

It doesn't matter that neither President Barack Obama nor congressional Democrats are calling for a wholesale repeal of gun rights. Tea partyers are enraged by the possibility of any erosion of the Second Amendment's "right of the people to keep and bear arms."

The gun control debate in Washington took center stage after the Newtown, Conn., school massacre in December, when a gunman used a semi-automatic assault rifle to kill 26 people, 20 of them children. The Obama administration and congressional Democrats have promised to make gun restrictions a legislative priority. Obama already has proposed requiring background checks for all gun sales and reviving both an assault weapons ban and a 10-round limit on the size of ammunition magazines.

There was little mention of the school shooting at the New Hampshire rally, where the crowd focused squarely on the belief that helped lead to the creation of the tea party movement four years ago: that an overbearing government is trampling on the nation's founding principles.

"There is an assault going on on the Constitution. And that is job one of ours ? to protect our flank and protect gun owners," said Tom Gaitens, a Tampa, Fla.-based tea party leader. "To us, this is the fundamental issue on the founding of our nation."

Florida tea party activists already have traveled to Washington to protest new gun restrictions, and conservative leaders in the state are considering a series of gun-related rallies, Gaitens said.

Many protesters are hunters, but say access to hunting is not their prime concern ? just as a sign hanging behind the podium at the New Hampshire rally said: "The right to keep arms is not about deer hunting. It is about defending the republic from tyranny."

"I don't have an automatic weapon. I don't want an automatic weapon. But the citizens need to have guns that are equal to the guns that the government has," said Roger Rist, a 69-year-old business owner from Meredith. "I certainly hope I don't have to take up arms against the government. Might we have to? Yeah."

In Colorado, foes of illegal immigration have been quiet as the Democrat-controlled Legislature has moved to allow illegal immigrants to pay in-state tuition rates at state colleges and universities. Similar bills in the past drew dozens of angry witnesses, but only one man from a group opposing illegal immigration testified against it at the Statehouse this month, compared with a parade of supporters of the bill.

In contrast, gun advocates held a spirited rally at the Colorado Statehouse to oppose gun control measures and drew more than 100 people last month. They also held a widely-publicized training recently for teachers and school workers who want to carry guns at the workplace.

In Georgia, tea party conservatives have introduced a range of bills that together would effectively allow Georgians to carry weapons anywhere. They also attempt to exempt certain weapons from federal gun control laws.

"We don't have a single member who thinks we need any new laws on this," said Ken Baxley, a local tea party leader in southeast Georgia's Effingham County, said. "When that tragedy happened, our anger was directed at the shooter, not at the guns."

An Associated Press-GfK poll found last month that 58 percent of Americans felt the gun laws in the United States should be stricter. Among Republicans, 53 percent want the nation's gun laws to stay as they are, while 2 in 3 women favor stricter gun laws, as do 60 percent of independents.

The fate of new gun legislation on Capitol Hill is uncertain at best. And as tea party activists clamor against any changes, the powerful gun lobby is echoing their argument.

"I think without any doubt, if you look at why our Founding Fathers put (the Second Amendment) there, they had lived under the tyranny of King George and they wanted to make sure that these free people in this new country would never be subjugated again and have to live under tyranny," Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the National Rifle Association said in a congressional hearing last week.

___

Associated Press writers Nicholas Riccardi in Denver and Bill Barrow in Atlanta contributed to this report.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/conservatives-gun-issue-rallying-cry-155442574--politics.html

best cyber monday deals best cyber monday deals macaulay culkin Larry Hagman macys apple apple

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Video: The Night Hannah Hill Disappeared, Part 4

Dateline NBC

'Dateline NBC,' the signature broadcast for NBC News in primetime, premiered in 1992. Since then, it has been pioneering a new approach to primetime news programming. The multi-night franchise, supplemented by frequent specials, allows NBC to consistently and comprehensively present the highest-quality reporting, investigative features, breaking news coverage and newsmaker profiles.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3032600/vp/50673973#50673973

fred thompson fred thompson red hook

Digital vs old type thermostat - DIY Home Improvement, Remodeling ...

With my furnace problems and my oversize (168,000 input BTU/hr, 80% efficient) furnace being on only 1/3 of the time in winter, today I measured a cycle, once the setpoint had been reached.
It was the blower being four minutes on and 6 minutes off, a 40% duty cycle.

I have never been able to get a definition of short cycling but this sounds like an example of it.
Four minutes on is probably too short in any case but once the setpoint is reached I'd think a low duty cycle is expected.

Anybody have a short cycling definition for house HVAC, what it is and what it is not? It should probably involve both on-time and duty cycle. Maybe you'd also need a per hour basis to take into account the heat capacity of the house?


Last edited by Wuzzat?; 02-01-2013 at 05:39 PM.

Source: http://www.houserepairtalk.com/f8/digital-vs-old-type-thermostat-15488/

higgs boson Malware Monday First Row Sports

Friday, February 1, 2013

Beck rants about 'handicapable, transgendered breast cancer ...

By David Edwards
Friday, February 1, 2013 12:00 EST

?

Conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Thursday blasted the Pentagon?s decision to lift the ban on women serving in combat roles by warning that the enemies of the United States would not ?cower in defeat because we have a female, Hispanic, Eskimo, dwarf cross dresser and some handicapable, transgendered breast cancer survivor as a soldier on the front line.?

?Nobody wants to be a pig, nobody wants to say the unpopular things, we just want to talk about the truth tonight,? Beck explained at the top of his Thursday broadcast. ?If a few feathers are ruffled, oh well.?

?This is the dumbest idea I?ve ever heard,? he continued. ?The military is not designed to be beacon of equality, it?s designed to defend the country in times of danger. And quite honestly, war is the act of killing each other. And to win, you have to kill people faster than the other team. That?s what war is all about.?

?The enemy is not going to cower in defeat because we have a female, Hispanic, Eskimo, dwarf cross dresser and some handicapable, transgendered breast cancer survivor as a soldier on the front line ready to unleash an attack of unparalleled diversity. Nope, that?s not going to do it. You gotta kill them. That?s how you make people cower in defeat.?

Beck admitted there there were already many women serving on the front lines, ?shooting, getting injured, getting blown up.? But he insisted that combat was ?a different ballgame.?

?This is a disastrous idea that will not only weaken our military, but put women?s lives at risk because they?ll just lower the standards,? he added. ?What happens when we train our soldiers to become desensitized and ignore a woman?s cry for help? Because that?s what?s happening. If you?re on the battlefield and she?s in trouble, you have to fight your natural instincts to make sure that everybody?s treated exactly equal.?

?We all know how excruciatingly difficult it is to see videos of a terrorist beheading one of our guys. What happens to our country when they start releasing tapes of them beheading our women, our sisters, our daughters? What happens when they start raping them??

Watch this video from The Blaze, broadcast Jan. 31. 2013.

(h/t: Right Wing Watch)

?

?

?

?

?

Source: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/01/beck-rants-about-handicapable-transgendered-breast-cancer-survivors-in-combat/

role models ferdinand porsche gregg williams theraflu masters leaderboard frozen four joe avezzano

Study sees prostate cancer treatment side effects

A new study shows how important it is for men to carefully consider treatments for early-stage prostate cancer. Fifteen years after surgery or radiation treatment, nearly all of the older men in the study had some problems having sex.

About one-fifth had bladder or bowel trouble, researchers found.

The study doesn't compare these men ? who were 70 to 89 at the end of the study ? to others who did not treat their cancers or to older men without the disease. At least one study suggests that half that age group has sexual problems even when healthy.

The study isn't a rigorous test of surgery and radiation, but it is the longest follow-up of some men who chose those treatments.

Since early prostate cancers usually don't prove fatal but there are no good ways to tell which ones really need treatment, men must be realistic about side effects they might suffer, said one study leader, Dr. David Penson of Vanderbilt University.

"They need to look at these findings and say, 'Oh my gosh, no matter what I choose, I'm going to have some quality-of-life effect and it's probably greater than my doctor is telling me,'" he said.

The study appears in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men. In the United States alone, there were about 240,000 new cases and 28,000 deaths from the disease last year. Radiation or surgery to remove the prostate are common treatments when the disease is confined to the gland.

Men usually live a long time after treatment ? 14 years on average ? so it's important to see how they fare, said another study leader, Vanderbilt's Dr. Matthew Resnick.

The study involved 1,655 men diagnosed in 1994 or 1995, when they were ages 55 to 74. About two-thirds of them had surgery and the rest, radiation. They were surveyed two, five and 15 years later. By that time, 569 had died.

Men who had surgery had more problems in the first few years after their treatments than those given radiation, but by the end of the study, there was no big difference.

After 15 years, 18 percent of the surgery group and 9 percent of the radiation group reported urinary incontinence, and 5 percent of the surgery group and 16 percent of the radiation group said they were bothered by bowel problems. But the differences between the two groups could have occurred by chance alone once researchers took other factors such as age and the size of the men's tumors into account.

Impotence was "near universal" at 15 years, the authors write ? 94 percent of the radiation group and 87 percent of the surgery group. But the difference between the groups also was considered possibly due to chance. Also, less than half of men said they were bothered by their sexual problems.

"These men do get some help from pills like Viagra, Cialis, Levitra," but it may not be as much as they would like and most men would rather not need those pills, Penson said.

The National Cancer Institute paid for the study. Two authors have consulted for several makers of prostate cancer treatment drugs.

No study is perfect and this one has many limitations, said Dr. Timothy Wilson, urology chief at City of Hope, a cancer center in Duarte, Calif. Men who are having problems are more likely to complete follow-up surveys because they're angry, so that could skew results, he noted.

Still, "it's a high percentage" with side effects, said Wilson, who has been a paid speaker for two makers of surgery equipment.

"There's no question we overtreat" many cases of early prostate cancer, yet the disease is still the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in men. "We need to better sort out who really needs treatment," he said.

___

Online:

New England Journal: http://www.nejm.org

___

Marilynn Marchione can be followed at http://twitter.com/MMarchioneAP

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/study-sees-prostate-cancer-treatment-side-effects-222544696.html

babe ruth new jersey nets nba playoff schedule rondo morris claiborne mothers day gifts clippers